Legal Opinion

Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1926No. Docket No. 4120PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover upon a liability insurance policy. Plaintiff is the assignee of the assured. A general demurrer to the complaint was over ruled. Defendant elected to stand upon its demurrer and declined to answer, whereupon a judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $500 and costs. Defendant claims that the complaint does not state a cause of action and that its demurrer was improperly overruled. The sufficiency of the complaint turns upon the construction to be placed upon the word “accident,” as employed in a clause of the policy which limits defendant’s liability to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  2. Chapin v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brown's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  4. Tuttle v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Dickson v. Omaha & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Truck Insurance Exchange v. RohdeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. Calvin T. Rutland, Doing Business as Rutland Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API