Legal Opinion

Miesen v. Bolich

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1960No. Civ. 18515PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant and cross-defendant, Pacific Employers Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as Pacific Employers) from two judgments under section 630 of the Code of Civil Procedure: the first in favor of plaintiff and respondent, Cecilia S. Miesen, the assignee of a judgment creditor under section 11580 of the Insurance Code; the second in favor of cross-complainants and respondents, Bill Bolich and Chuck Lundegard, individually and doing business as B & C Texaco Service for attorneys’ fees aggregating $1,700 and costs in this action.

On May 25, 1955, plaintiff, Cecilia…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Limited v. Youghiogheny & Ohio CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Juzefski v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Prickett v. Royal Ins. Co. Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lowell v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Providence Wash. Ins. Co. v. VALLEY FORGE INS.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Patterson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Heller v. Pillsbury Madison & SutroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API