Legal Opinion
State v. Friberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 31, 1989No. C5-87-1703PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendants petitioned this court to review a court of appeals decision which affirmed their conviction for trespassing and *511upheld a condition of probation which required them to stay 500 feet away from the premises on which they trespassed, 421 N.W.2d 376. Defendants argued their constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated because trial was delayed for more than 60 days after their demand pursuant to Minn.R.Crim.P. 6.06 and that the limited geographical exclusion made a condition of their probation unreasonably restricted their first amendment rights. We disagree.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Charles Farrell Malone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. TaltyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.