Legal Opinion

People v. Higinbotham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 21, 1986No. 83SA494PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

The People appeal from a judgment of the Fremont County District Court dismissing an information charging the defendant, Steven R. Higinbotham, with escape.1 The district court held that dismissal was required because Higinbotham, a prisoner, had not been informed promptly of the charge pending against him and of his right to request a final disposition of the charge as required by section 16-14-102(2), 8 C.R.S. (1978). We reverse and remand for reinstatement of the charge and for further proceedings.

I

On August 17, 1982, Higinbotham escaped from the Fremont Correctional Facility…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. MoodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. BarefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API