Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 2013No. A12-1276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

Under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (UMDDA), if a de-tainer is placed on a person who is incarcerated, the person may request that pending charges be brought to trial within six months, and the district court must dismiss the complaint with prejudice if that request is not timely honored. In this case, Michael Gilbert Brown seeks to invoke this provision of the UMDDA to dismiss a charge to which he pleaded guilty and for which he failed to appear for sentencing before he was imprisoned for a different offense. We conclude that Brown is not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Moody v. CorsentinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Minnesota v. Joel Patrick RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API