Legal Opinion
Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Klug
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1986No. C8-86-731PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment. Respondent, Continental Western Insurance Company, denied Russell and Wendy Klug’s claim for no-fault and uninsured motorist benefits. The Klugs had claimed coverage for injuries sustained by appellant, Russell Klug, when he was shot by another motorist while driving his car.
On October 2, 1985, respondent brought a declaratory judgment action. Respondent requested the trial court hold that appellants are not entitled to receive no-fault or uninsured motorist benefits under an automobile policy issued by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ganiron v. Hawaii Insurance GuarantyHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.