Legal Opinion

Falconer v. Penn Maritime, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided November 14, 2005No. CIV. 05-42-B-WPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM OF SIU LIEN

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

Arguing that Mr. Falconer is not entitled to a double recovery, Penn Maritime, Inc. (Penn Maritime) moves to bar evidence that Bruce Falconer has incurred past medical expenses, because Penn Maritime either voluntarily paid the medical bills or voluntarily paid for medical insurance, which has paid the bills. Def.’s Mot. at 1, 2 (Docket # 100). In response, relying on DeMedeiros v. Koehring Co., 709 F.2d 734 (1st Cir.1983), Mr. Falconer argues that since the health insurer has a lien on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster General, Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Earl K. Phillips and Carrie Phillips v. The Western Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Beverly P. Davis, Wife Of/and Willie Earl Davis v. Odeco, Inc., Murphy Exploration & Production Company, Originally Sued as Odeco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hylind v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  3. Moore v. Industrial Demolition LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
  4. Zagklara v. Sprague Energy Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2013
  5. City of Stuart, Florida v. The 3M CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API