Legal Opinion
Hylind v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 9, 2014No. Civil No. PJM 03-116PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
I
Introduction
Eileen M. Hylind sued Xerox Corporation for sexual discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Following a jury trial, she was awarded compensatory damages, subsequently capped by the Court at the statutory maximum of $300,000, and $896,509 in economic damages (back pay). The Court offset pay*733ments Hylind received pursuant to Xerox’s disability plan from the back pay award.
Both parties appealed to the Fourth Circuit. The case returns to this Court on remand from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Alvin PROMISEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIRST AMERICAN ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Earl K. Phillips and Carrie Phillips v. The Western Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Beverly P. Davis, Wife Of/and Willie Earl Davis v. Odeco, Inc., Murphy Exploration & Production Company, Originally Sued as Odeco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aletum v. Opusing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- City of Stuart, Florida v. The 3M CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. MSDS Consultant Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021