Legal Opinion

City of Stuart, Florida v. The 3M Company

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 25, 2023No. 2:18-cv-03487Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ) IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING ) MDL No. 2:18-mn-2873-RMG FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY ) LITIGATION ) ORDER AND OPINION ) ) This Order Relates to ) City of Stuart, Fl. v. 3M Co., et al., ) Case No. 2:18-cv-3487-RMG ) ) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion in limine no. 6 to exclude all evidence, reference, testimony, comment, inference, document, and/or argument suggesting that Plaintiff’s costs of implementing necessary water filtration systems has been (or will be) covered by the state of Florida and/or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Sloas v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. Haile v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API