Legal Opinion

Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 2, 1963No. 200PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner brought this action in the District Court for the Southern District of Texas against his employer under the Jones Act. 46 U. S. C. § 688. The principal issue was whether, in view of the nature of the work performed at the time of injury, the petitioner was a seaman, hence within the coverage of the Jones Act, or an offshore drilling employee. At the trial before a jury, the District Court admitted evidence, over the objection of petitioner’s counsel, that petitioner had accepted compensation bene*35fits under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U. S. C. § 901…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Clarence D. Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc. And Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Southwest Marine, Inc. v. GizoniSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API