Legal Opinion

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Gardner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 2007No. 49A02-0610-CV-917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Following a jury trial, at which the jury found CSX Transportation, Inc., liable for injuries sustained by an employee, Robert Gardner, CSX appeals the trial court’s denial of its post-trial motion to offset the amount awarded to Gardner by the amount CSX had contributed to a fund from which Gardner was receiving a disability annuity pursuant to the Railroad Retirement Act (the “RRA”). CSX raises the sole issue of whether it is entitled to setoff this amount as a matter of law. Concluding that CSX is not entitled to setoff this amount, we affirm.

Facts…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Palmer v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Wilkins v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Lockley v. CSX Transportation Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API