Legal Opinion
United States v. Caputo
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 15, 2005No. 03CR126PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, J.
On February 22, 2005, Defendants Ross Caputo and Robert Riley (“Defendants”) informed the Government, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(C), that they may call Ronald M. Johnson, Robert L. Sheridan, William A. Rutala, and Gordon W. Whitaker to provide expert testimony at trial. They dis closed each expert’s qualifications as well as an overview of their expected testimony. The Government has filed a motion to compel Defendants to provide a more specific statement of the reasons and bases underlying the disclosed expert testimony and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Margaret Woods v. Robert LecureuxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Darryl Lamont JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Deborah Cullen v. Indiana University Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. FerroneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Thomas Ex Rel. Smith v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- United States ex rel. Garbe v. Kmart Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2015
- United States v. CaputoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Graham v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.