Legal Opinion
Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1942No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Parker,
This is an appeal by the Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Company from an order of the Superior Court (146 Pa. Superior Ct. 274, 22 A. 2d 37) modifying an order of the Public Utility Commission (successor to the Public Service Commission) finding that the rates of that company were unreasonable, oppressive and extortionate from October 17, 1933, to January 1, 1937, and directing that reparations should be awarded for that period. The principal matter to be determined in this appeal is the earliest date from which reparations may be allowed on account of any claims…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Centre County Lime Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Centre County Lime Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.