Legal Opinion

New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York Central R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1920No. Appeal, No. 154PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal, No. 154, Jan. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clinton Co., July T., 1918, No. 66, for plaintiff on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York Central Railroad Co. Assumpsit to recover amount awarded under an order of reparation of the Public Service Commission. The case was tried by McCormick, P. J., without a jury under an agreement of counsel. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 154, Jan. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clinton Co., July T., 1918, No. 66, for plaintiff on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York Central Railroad Co. Assumpsit to recover amount awarded under an order of reparation of the Public Service Commission. The case was tried by McCormick, P. J., without a jury under an agreement of counsel. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court entered judgment for plaintiff for $9,997.57. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were various findings and rulings…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The facts in this case are undisputed, and the legal questions involved, nearly all of which depend upon a proper construction of the Public Service Company Law of July 26,1913, P. L. 1374, are not difficult of solution to those whose only anxiety is that its beneficent provisions shall be wisely administered for the benefit alike of the carrier, the shipper and the public.

The transportation of coal from the Munson and Hawk Run Mining Districts to Lock Haven, all in this State, is by the railroad of defendant to Bald Eagle Junction, and thereafter by that of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Davis v. Investment Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API