Legal Opinion

Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1935No. Appeal, 381PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

On December 11, 1934, the Public Service Commis sion of this Commonwealth on its own motion instituted a proceeding for the purpose of determining the fairness, reasonableness and justness of the rates, charges and regulations of the Cheltenham and Abington Sewerage Company as contained in its published tariffs. In this capacity we shall refer to the commission as the complainant. The respondent filed an answer denying that its rates were unreasonable, unfair or unjust and averring on the contrary that they were inadequate and less than it was entitled to charge. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Clark’s Ferry Bridge Co. v. Public Service Commission of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API