Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Dugan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1898No. 2,242PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Prom the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Comstock, J. —

The trial of this cause was had upon the second paragraph of the complaint. The only part of said paragraph which requires consideration is as follows: “That on the 18th day of December, 1894, and for a long time prior thereto, this plaintiff was engaged in farming said lands in said section thirty-one, and especially the land lying immediately adjoining the line of railroad running through said section thirty-one. And plaintiff avers that there is a public highway running from the center of said section thirty-one north, and what is known and called the ‘Crawfordsville Pike’…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gregory v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API