Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Dugan
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Comstock, J. —
The trial of this cause was had upon the second paragraph of the complaint. The only part of said paragraph which requires consideration is as follows: “That on the 18th day of December, 1894, and for a long time prior thereto, this plaintiff was engaged in farming said lands in said section thirty-one, and especially the land lying immediately adjoining the line of railroad running through said section thirty-one. And plaintiff avers that there is a public highway running from the center of said section thirty-one north, and what is known and called the ‘Crawfordsville Pike’…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Gregory v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.