Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Stewart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1900No. 2,441PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, C. J.

Counsel for appellee, in their brief, aptly say that the “question presented in this case is whether or not appellee is entitled to recover damages for personal injuries caused by fright, and resulting in nervous prostration and a permanent impairment of health.” The record, by the assignment of errors, presents but two questions: (1) The sufficiency of the amended complaint, and (2) the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

If the amended complaint, upon its conceded theory, does not state a cause of action, questions arising under the motion for a new trial need not be noticed. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Braun v. CravenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Zehner v. TriggDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
  3. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Strazza v. McKittrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Boston v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API