Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. King

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1900No. 3,036PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Comstock, J.- —

Appellee in her complaint alleges that appellant created and maintained a nuisance, to the damage of her property and the comfortable enjoyment thereof. The acts complained of consisted in casting into a large pond adjacent to appellee’s premises 'carloads.of dirt and offensive material, causing thereby the water to become foul . and poisonous. Appellee’s dwelling-house and premises were located some 100 feet from the pond, and, before the acts complained of, was used for the purpose of a. residence by herself and two children. The water of the well on the premises was polluted…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hargreaves v. KimberlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Rust v. GuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bischof v. Merchants National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API