Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Detroit Asphalt Paving Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928No. Docket No. 141, Calendar No. 33,583PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The attorney general filed an information in the nature of quo warranto in the circuit court for the county of Ingham against the defendant, Detroit Asphalt Paving Company, a Michigan corporation, seeking to annul its franchise and oust it from longer doing business in the State on the ground that it was-a trust and monopoly within the meaning of Act No. 255, Pub. Acts 1899 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§15013-15026), as amended by Act No. 60, Pub. Acts 1925, and Act No. 329, Pub. Acts 1905 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 15033-15039). There had been a prosecution conducted in the recorder’s court of Detroit,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. American Tobacco Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
  3. Attorney General ex rel. James v. National Cash Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Grand Union Tea Co. v. LewitskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Oscar Daniels Co. v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Innovation Ventures v. Liquid ManufacturingMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bristol Window and Door, Inc. v. HoogenstynMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. STAEBLER-KEMPE OIL CO. v. Mac's Auto Mart, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Barrows v. Grand Rapids Real Estate BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Michigan Association of Psychotherapy Clinics v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API