Attorney General ex rel. James v. National Cash Register Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in the nature of quo warranto by John E. Bird, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on the relation of Henry F. James, against the National Cash Register Company, a foreign corporation, to terminate the right of respondent to engage in business in the State of Michigan on the ground that it is exercising a monopoly.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto on behalf of the people of this State, on relation of Henry F. James, filed in this court on July 14, 1909, in and by which the court was informed that the National Cash Register Company, an Ohio corporation, admitted to do business in Michigan, had been for the year last past, and then was, violating the anti-trust laws of Michigan in establishing and maintaining a monopoly of the business of manufacturing, buying, selling, and dealing in cash registers, and conspiring with its officers, directors, stockholders, agents, and others to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Davenport v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1887
- Cooke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Evenson v. SpauldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. American Medical Centers of Michigan, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.