Legal Opinion
Grand Union Tea Co. v. Lewitsky
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1908No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by the Grand Union Tea Company against Ignaoy Lewitsky to restrain the violation of a contract of employment. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
On the 11th day of February, 1907, the parties to this suit entered into the following agreement in writing:
“Whereas, second party is desirous of securing employment with first party in the business of soliciting orders for and delivering teas, coffees, spices, baking powder, light groceries, etc., and such other goods as are now or may be hereafter handled by first party at its store at No. 140 Michigan avenue, Detroit, Mich., the territory to be solicited and operated by second party to be in the city of Detroit, Mich., and such other place or places as may be mutually agreed upon.
“Therefore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Enders v. EndersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Osius v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Hulen v. EarelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Wedin v. AtherholtMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Grand Union Tea Co. v. DoddsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Detroit Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Dow Chemical Co. v. American Bromine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.