Legal Opinion

Oscar Daniels Co. v. City of Sault Ste. Marie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1919No. Docket No. 107PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead (Louis H.), J. Assumpsit by the Oscar Daniels Company against the city of Sault Ste. Marie for taxes paid under protest. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). Although not raised by counsel for appellee, the first question *374presented by the record is whether there is anything before the court for its determination. It has been held that where no request for special findings is made and no findings in fact made and no exception taken, there is nothing to review. Nichol v. Ward, 156 Mich. 136; Wilson v. Hugus, 163 Mich. 577.

And it has been repeatedly held that where no exceptions are taken to any of the findings and it is not-assigned as error, or contended, that the facts found do not support the conclusions of law,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McGlinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Willis v. Oscar Daniels Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Nichol v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wilson v. HugusMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crane v. Leonard, Crossette & RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Detroit Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Haynie v. Surplus Trading Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Jackson v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Michigan Central Railroad v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API