Legal Opinion
Eckhardt v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1943PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The defendant, Campbell’s Dollar Stores, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Campbell’s,” is engaged in conducting a mercantile business at Waupaca, Wisconsin. The facts as to which there is no substantial dispute were found by the Industrial Commission as follows :
“Findings of Fact.
“That applicant was manager of respondent’s store at Waupaca, Wisconsin; that respondent leased the building containing the store, in the second story of which was an apartment suitable and used for living quarters; that applicant moved into the apartment at the request of respondent and received as wage $13 per…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Holt Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Industrial Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Weber v. WaltersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Gibbs Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Benz v. ZobelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.