Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Gintert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1934No. 24432PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

A decision of this case requires only a consideration of the basic principles of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and an application thereof to the facts disclosed by the record. Let us paraphrase the statement of Webster upon the occasion when he pictured the mariner endeavoring to ascertain how far he had been driven by the elements from his true course and suggested that we “imitate his prudence and before we float further on the waves refer to the point from which we departed, that we may at least be able to conjecture where we now are.”

The ’Workmen’s Compensation Act was passed pursuant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Industrial Commission v. AhernOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. ContieOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Industrial Commission v. HeilOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Industrial Commission v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API