Industrial Commission v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action by employe to recover under the workmen’s compensation act, for injuries sustained while on.his way to work. Judgment for claimant. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. John H. Denison, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
Plaintiffs in error bring here for review a judgment of the district court reversing the conclusions of the Industrial Commission of the State of Colorado, wherein defendant in error was found not entitled to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. In this opinion the parties will be designated as in the court below'.
The facts as disclosed by .the findings of the Commission are that the plaintiff, a man of about seventy-eight years of age, was employed by The Robert D. Sharp Music Company as a repairer of musical instruments. He worked in Denver at the shop in the store of his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hopkins v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Claim of Newman v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Alexander Film Company v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Comstock v. BivensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Gale v. Krug Park Amusement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1926
- O. P. Skaggs Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Industrial Commission v. LavachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.