Legal Opinion

Weber v. Walters

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1954PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

The jury’s finding that Fletcher was negligent with respect to the manner in which he controlled his truck *255is not attacked. Plaintiff contends that the court should have found as a matter of law that such negligence was a proximate cause of the collision. That is the sole question presented upon this appeal.

“The rule of law is well established that if the evidence is conflicting, or if the inferences to be drawn from the credible evidence are doubtful and uncertain, and there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view will support or admit of an inference either for or against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Roeske v. SchmittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Schultz v. BroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Eckhardt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wadoz v. United National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bruss v. Milwaukee Sporting Goods Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Nelson v. L. & J. PRESS CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rewolinski v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wills v. ReganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API