Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1972No. 42368, 42369, 42370PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

Once more the implied consent statute (Laws of 1969, ch. 1; Initiative Measure No. 242; RCW 46.20.092; 46.20.308; 46.20.311; 46.20.911, and 46.61.506) comes before us for construction.

The facts are essentially the same in each of these consolidated cases. In each, the respondent was arrested by an officer having reasonable cause to believe that he was operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, who requested that he submit to a chemical test of his breath to determine the presence of alcohol in his blood, and advised him that his refusal to so submit would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Connolly v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Department of Motor Vehicles v. McElwainWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. FelixWashington Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BartelsWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API