State v. Stannard
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Callow, J. —
This case involves the right of a person suspected of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor to have a second Breathalyzer test performed at the suspect's request contemporaneously with the one performed at the request of the arresting officer. The defendants assert that such a right is guaranteed either by RCW 46.20.308(2) and 46.61.506 or by article 1, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution. We hold that the right to a second Breathalyzer test is neither statutorily or constitutionally guaranteed.
John Appel was arrested for driving while under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.