Legal Opinion

State v. Stannard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1987No. 52495-5, 52597-8PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Callow, J. —

This case involves the right of a person suspected of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor to have a second Breathalyzer test performed at the suspect's request contemporaneously with the one performed at the request of the arresting officer. The defendants assert that such a right is guaranteed either by RCW 46.20.308(2) and 46.61.506 or by article 1, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution. We hold that the right to a second Breathalyzer test is neither statutorily or constitutionally guaranteed.

John Appel was arrested for driving while under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API