Legal Opinion

State v. Storhoff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1997No. 64860-3PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, C. J.

— Habitual traffic offenders Douglas StorhofF, Virgil Tucker, and Jeffrey S. Oropesa (Defendants) seek dismissal of charges of driving while license revoked1 based on incorrect notices of the time limit for requesting a formal license revocation hearing under RCW 46.65.065(1). We hold that the incorrect revocation notices (1) did not violate procedural due process, and (2) do not otherwise preclude prosecution of the Defendants for driving while license revoked in the absence of actual prejudice to the Defendants.

*526 Background:

The Department of Licensing (DOL) sent each Defendant written notice…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BartelsWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API