State v. Bartels
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, C.J.
We are asked in these consolidated cases to suppress the results of certain blood alcohol content tests. Each defendant agreed to submit to a test after being told that he or she had the right to have a qualified person administer an additional test "at your own expense." We hold that the quoted language is improper.
I
Each defendant in these cases was arrested for suspicion of driving while intoxicated. The arresting officer properly advised each defendant of his or her Miranda rights, and then asked the defendant to submit to either a BAC Verifier test, a Breathalyzer test, or a blood test to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CanadayWashington Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.