Legal Opinion
Marsoun v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 2008No. Civil Action 07-2078 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Marsoun alleges that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has acted in disregard of federal tax law and regulations in connection with the collection of taxes for tax years 1990 through 2003. He seeks damages against defendant United States pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7433 and the U.S. Constitution. Presently pending before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Headen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Stoyanov v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Terry v. U.S. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Pragovich v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.