Legal Opinion
Scott v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 17, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1529 (ESH)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert Scott and Linda Casoria-Scott have filed an amended pro se complaint alleging in twenty-seven “counts” that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has unlawfully required plaintiffs to file tax returns and has disregarded provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and its regulations in the course of pursuing collection activities against plaintiffs, all in violation of the United States Constitution and 26 U.S.C. § 7433. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages as their only remedy. Plaintiffs’ tax protests also formed the basis for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kim v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Whittington v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hicks v. Dc Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.