Legal Opinion
Headen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 5, 2010No. Civil Action 10-0784 (ESH)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Vernice Headen, proceeding pro se, has sued defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for retaliation, discrimination, defamation, wrongful termination, emotional distress, and hostile work environment. 1 Before the Court is WMATA’s motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Having reviewed the complaint, the memoranda filed by the parties, and applicable case law, the Court will grant defendant’s motion and dismiss plaintiffs claims.
FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- McMillan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Battles v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Cutchin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.