Mountain View Union High School District v. Ormonde
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
An almost unbelievable accumulation of procedural snarls in this eminent domain proceeding has led to the present appeal by condemner from judgment awarding costs and attorneys’ fees to defendant eondemnee.
The action was commenced to condemn for school purposes some 50 acres of an 80-acre parcel owned by defendant. Two months later the school board adopted a supplementary resolution, reducing the proposed take to 40 acres, and revising accordingly the metes and bounds description. An “amend ment and supplement to complaint” was filed, setting forth the new resolution.
These resolutions,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. State Public Works Board v. Westover Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Shannon v. Northern Counties Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- County of Kern v. GalatasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.