Legal Opinion

Hizam v. Blackman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1925PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The complaint contains these allegations, which were not disputed: “1. On the 10th day of December, 1924, at about the hour of 5:50 p.m., the plaintiff was walking across Noble Avenue in said Bridgeport from the west side to the east side of said Noble Avenue a.t a point nearly opposite the house known as 776 Noble Avenue just north of the intersection of Ogden Street with Noble Avenue. 2. At said time and place the defendant was operating an automobile in a northerly direction on said Noble Avenue.”

These allegations, reasonably interpreted, mean that during the whole time that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Radwick v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Seabridge v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Mezzi v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Walters v. HansenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fabling v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Howley v. KantorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. Carey v. GuestMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Puza v. HamwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Farkas v. HalliwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API