Farkas v. Halliwell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff sued to recover for damage to his automobile which resulted when it came into collision with a cow owned by the defendants. He claimed that the defendants were negligent because they did not have the cow under reasonable and proper control and because the cow was unattended. The defendants denied any negligence on their part and pleaded and claimed contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The trial court concluded that the defendants were negligent because they failed to restrain and guide the cow along the road properly *442and adequately, or to have any restraining or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Seabridge v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Edens v. Kole Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Banks v. AdelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Johnson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Silverman v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.