Legal Opinion

Howley v. Kantor

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The plaintiff was struck by the defendant’s automobile and injured while she was crossing Merchants Row in the city of Rutland at about nine o’clock in the evening of March 4, 1930. It is not questioned that the evidence reasonably justified a finding by the jury that negligence of the defendant proximately caused the accident, but the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, as a matter of law, is raised by defendant’s exception to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict.

Merchants Row is a busy street in the heart of the business' section. This streets runs north and south,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Strohm v. . the N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. State v. RoundsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Steele v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  5. Aiken v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Human Rights Commission v. LaBrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Lorrain v. RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Burton v. Holden & Martin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API