Legal Opinion

Cole v. Laverty

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 20, 2002No. 20418-9-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

When Charles Cole bought a parcel of land in 2000, his deed included an easement for ingress, egress, and utilities across the south 16 feet of land owned by Michael and Gay Laverty. The Lavertys had blocked access to this area in 1983 with a fence, locked gates, and two bathtubs used as planters. Mr. Cole brought suit to quiet title in the easement and the Lavertys counterclaimed, arguing the easement was terminated by adverse possession. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Mr. Cole, quieting title to an easement for access and repair of utilities, but also granted partial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Edmonds v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cole v. LavertyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. LITTLEFAIR v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Littlefair v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Colwell v. EtzellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Colwell v. EtzellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API