Legal Opinion
Cole v. Laverty
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 20, 2002No. 20418-9-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
49 P.3d 924 (2002)
112 Wash.App. 180
Charles M. COLE, a single person, Appellant,
v.
Michael LAVERTY and Gay Laverty, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 20418-9-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
June 20, 2002.
Scott C. Broyles, Clarkston, for Appellant.
Thomas L. Ledgerwood, Clarkston, for Respondents.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
When Charles Cole bought a parcel of land in 2000, his deed included an easement for ingress, egress, and utilities across the south 16 feet of land owned by Michael and Gay Laverty. The Lavertys had blocked access to this area in 1983 with a fence, locked gates,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Edmonds v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LITTLEFAIR v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Littlefair v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Colwell v. EtzellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Colwell v. EtzellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Empress Estate, Llc, App/cross-resp v. Timothy J. Doyle, Et Ux, Res/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.