Legal Opinion

Littlefair v. Schulze

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 5, 2012No. 41448-1-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

¶1 Peter Littlefair and David Schulze own property in Foster’s Addition, which they access by a 40-foot-wide easement road. The actual road varies in width but is generally a one-lane roadway. In 2007, Schulze constructed a fence on his property, which lies within the 40-foot wide reserved area. Littlefair sued Schulze, essentially asking the court to order Schulze to remove the fence. The trial court denied Littlefair relief, finding that Schulze’s fence did not interfere with Littlefair’s use of the road and that the fence was not a nuisance based on its violation of a Skamania County…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allan Margitan, et ux v. Mark Hanna, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. City of Selah v. Steve Owens and Janet OwensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  3. Cynthia Hebert & James D. Hebert v. Spring Creek Easement Owners AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Empress Estate, Llc, App/cross-resp v. Timothy J. Doyle, Et Ux, Res/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Jeffrey Horn, et ux v. Steven F. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API