Legal Opinion
McClellan v. Bond
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1884No. 10,691PublishedCited by 19 opinions
From the DeKalb Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
What the appellant denominates a special finding is not signed by the judge, nor incorporated in a bill of exceptions, nor is it made part of the record by order of the trial court. We can not treat it as a special finding of facts within the meaning of the statute. Peoria, etc., Ins. Co. v. Walser, 22 Ind. 73; Roberts v. Smith, 34 Ind. 550; Welborn v. Lewis, 42 Ind. 363; Board, etc., v. Reynolds, 44 Ind. 509 (15 Am. R. 245); Conwell v. Clifford, 45 Ind. 392; Shane v. Lowry, 48 Ind. 205; Bake v. Smiley, 84 Ind. 212.
It is within the discretion of the trial court to permit or1 refuse to permit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Enid & Anadarko Railway Co. v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.