Enid & Anadarko Railway Co. v. Wiley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Blaine County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. The Jünid and Anadarko Kailway Company instituted proceedings in Blaine county, Oklahoma, to condemn a right of way for its railroad over and across the southwest quarter of section number one (1), township thirteen (13) north, range eleven (11) west of the Indian Meridian.
Read the full summary
Error from the District Court of Blaine County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. The Jünid and Anadarko Kailway Company instituted proceedings in Blaine county, Oklahoma, to condemn a right of way for its railroad over and across the southwest quarter of section number one (1), township thirteen (13) north, range eleven (11) west of the Indian Meridian. Appraisers were apointecl and made their report assessing the damage to the owners of the land at six hundred dollars. The company deposited the amount of the award with the clerk of the district court in Blaine…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
Three questions are presented and relied upon by counsel for plaintiff-in error, and we will consider and determine them in their order. It appears from the record that the plaintiffs in support of their allegations of ownership of the land in controversy introduced the register of deeds of Blaine county as a witness, and had him produce and identify a record of that office kept and known as the patent record. This record contained a record of the patent for said land from the United States to one of plaintiffs in this ease. The plaintiffs offered in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Stanley v. SutherlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- City of Chicago v. BarbianIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fender, Adm'r v. SegroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Eby v. City of LewistownMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Gilbert v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. FroeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.