Branch v. Faust
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Appellant has assigned as errors that the third paragraph of appellee’s complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the court below erred in its conclusions of law upon the facts specially found.
These assignments are met by counsel for appellee with the contention that error can not be assigned in this court that a single paragraph of a complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that, as the special finding of facts and conclusions of law copied into the transcript are not signed by the judge, and have not been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCallister v. MountIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Trammel v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Conner v. Town of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Shane v. LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- McClellan v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Eacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.