Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1944No. Nos. 33,774, 33,775PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

In separate actions, plaintiff Conroy, as* the owner and driver of an automobile, sought to recover for personal injuries and property damage, and plaintiff Flaherty, as his guest passenger, sought to recover for personal injuries sustained about midnight on April 30, 1942, as the result of a collision between Conroy’s automobile and the side of a freight car on a railroad track extending across Grove street in the city of St. Paul. The complaints allege that the freight car was placed across the street in violation of statute and ordinance and that a view of it was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Brulla v. CassadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Dickey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of HewittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API