Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dickey v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 13, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAdams, J.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury caused by a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was riding as a guest, and the defendant's train standing across a street in the town of Parmelee in violation of an ordinance of said town.

The evidence tends to show that on the night of 10 March, 1924, plaintiff, as an invited guest, started on an automobile trip with one Frank Donnell, owner and driver of the car, from Robersonville to Greenville to attend a show. At Parmelee, while running about 20 or 25 miles per hour, Donnell ran into a freight train belonging…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Taylor v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Albritton v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Bagwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. King v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Campbell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Norfleet v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Richardson v. LovvornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  5. Burke v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API