Legal Opinion
Dart v. Pure Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 9, 1947No. 34,073PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
This case is here on reargument. Subsequent to the original argument and before any decision was made, there was a change in the personnel of the court. Thereafter and on April 26, 1946, the court ordered the parties involved to submit new briefs and invited a number of attorneys to file briefs as amici curiae.
Plaintiff as administratrix of the estate of her husband, Harry W. Dart, brought an action for damages for his death, alleged to have been caused by an explosion of a mixture of gasoline and kerosene sold to decedent in violation of Minn. St. 1945, §§ 296.01,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lambrecht v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Soronen v. Olde Milford Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zerby v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Lorshbough v. Township of BuzzleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.