Legal Opinion

Simon v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1954No. 36,072, 36,073, 36,074, 36,075PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

In each of four actions consolidated for trial defendant Carroll appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

We are here concerned with the following issues: (1) The right of a party who is both plaintiff and defendant in a joint trial to appear in each capacity by a separate set of attorneys, (2) whether an attorney who appears for a party in his capacity as a defendant may cross-examine a witness who appears for the same party in his capacity as a plaintiff, (3) the foundation necessary for testimony as to the reputation…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  3. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Wojtowicz v. BeldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Clark v. KleinIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hanson v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Vanderweyst v. LangfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API