Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Allstate Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 31, 1996No. 14897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal1 is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurer in the plaintiffs underinsured motorist action, where the plaintiff presented her claim for benefits beyond the two year time limit specified in the insurance policy for submitting such claims. The plaintiff asserts that her action is pre*49served by § 3 of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77 (P.A. 93-77),2 which saves certain underinsured motorist claims that were pending on December 8, 1992, or brought after that date and before May 20, 1993, from failure because of late…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Cebe-HaberskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Serrano v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Hotkowski v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bilodeau v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Fleet Credit Corp. v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API