Legal Opinion

McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1992No. 14512PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this appeal is the enforceability of a provision in a contract for uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage that requires the insured to initiate collection proceedings within a two year period from the occurrence of an automobile accident. The plaintiff, Donna McGlinchey (insured), filed a demand for arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim pursuant to her insurance contract with the defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (insurer). The arbitrators decided in favor of her claim, but the trial court, in response to a motion to vacate the arbitration award,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Orkney v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Serrano v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API