Legal Opinion

Bilodeau v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 1997No. 15796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted summaiy judgment in favor of the defendant in the plaintiffs action to recover underinsured motorist benefits, where the plaintiff presented her claim for benefits beyond the two year time limit specified in the insurance policy for submitting such claims. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. On Januaiy 12, 1991, the plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident, the plaintiff was insured by the defendant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Hotkowski v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Rivera v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bilodeau v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Gohel v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API